Reviewing scientific works in psychology
(from the preface) The motivation for this book was the realization that although many academics and others are called on to do reviewing, very few of them have any formal training, or sometimes, informal training, in how to referee. We who write all know how disconcerting it is to get a review that...
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:219390/TOC |
|---|---|
| Ostali autori: | Sternberg, Robert J. (-) |
| Vrsta građe: | Knjiga |
| Jezik: | eng |
| Impresum: |
Washington, D.C. :
American Psychological Association,
cop. 2006.
|
Sadržaj:
- Reviewing Empirical Submissions to Journals Abraham Tesser and Leonard Martin / 3-29
- Reviewing Articles for Methods Robert J. Sternberg and Elena L. Grigorenko / 31-42
- Reviewing Theory ArticlesRobert J. Sternberg / 43-58
- Refereeing Literature Review Submissions to Journals Alice H. Eagly / 59-77
- Reviewing Book Proposals Gary R. VandenBos, Julia Frank-McNeil, and Judith Amsel / 79-88
- Reviewing Book Chapters Henry L. Roediger III / 89-100
- Reviewing Grant and Contract Proposals Paul A. Gade, David P. Costanza, and Jonathan D. Kaplan / 101-123
- Index
- About the Editor