Two ways of dealing with scientific fraud
Criticism of science has so far followed two paths: by debunking fraudulent research, or by debunking pseudo-scientific claims. People believe weird things because high and hard sciences give them reasons to. Such high-science claims give them reasons to do so.
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:304835/Details |
|---|---|
| Matična publikacija: |
Revija za sociologiju 28 (1997), 3-4 ; str. 163-157 |
| Glavni autor: | Polšek, Darko (-) |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
| LEADER | 01283naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 131105s1997 xx eng|d | ||
| 022 | |a 0350-154X | ||
| 035 | |a (CROSBI)27286 | ||
| 040 | |a HR-ZaFF |b hrv |c HR-ZaFF |e ppiak | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Polšek, Darko | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Two ways of dealing with scientific fraud / |c Polšek, Darko. |
| 246 | 3 | |i Naslov na engleskom: |a Two ways of dealing with scientific fraud | |
| 300 | |a 163-157 |f str. | ||
| 363 | |a 28 |b 3-4 |i 1997 | ||
| 520 | |a Criticism of science has so far followed two paths: by debunking fraudulent research, or by debunking pseudo-scientific claims. People believe weird things because high and hard sciences give them reasons to. Such high-science claims give them reasons to do so. | ||
| 536 | |a Projekt MZOS |f 01940106 | ||
| 546 | |a ENG | ||
| 690 | |a 5.05 | ||
| 693 | |a scientific fraud, pseudoscience, trust in science, unverifiable hypothesis, no-nonsense science, symmetry principle, circle of credibility |l hrv |2 crosbi | ||
| 693 | |a scientific fraud, pseudoscience, trust in science, unverifiable hypothesis, no-nonsense science, symmetry principle, circle of credibility |l eng |2 crosbi | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Revija za sociologiju |x 0350-154X |g 28 (1997), 3-4 ; str. 163-157 | |
| 942 | |c CLA |t 1.01 |u 1 |z Znanstveni - clanak | ||
| 999 | |c 304835 |d 304833 | ||