Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers
Patients with cochlear implants have the ability to exercise auditory control over their own speech production and over the speech of others, which is important for the development of speech control. In the present investigation three groups of 10 subjects were compared. The groups comprised: 1. coc...
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:306002/Details |
|---|---|
| Matična publikacija: |
Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 20 (2006), 2/3 ; str. 211-217 |
| Glavni autori: | Horga, Damir (-), Liker, Marko (Author) |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
| LEADER | 01969naa a2200265uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 131105s2006 xx eng|d | ||
| 022 | |a 0269-9206 | ||
| 035 | |a (CROSBI)169356 | ||
| 040 | |a HR-ZaFF |b hrv |c HR-ZaFF |e ppiak | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Horga, Damir | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers / |c Horga, Damir ; Liker, Marko. |
| 246 | 3 | |i Naslov na engleskom: |a Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers | |
| 300 | |a 211-217 |f str. | ||
| 363 | |a 20 |b 2/3 |i 2006 | ||
| 520 | |a Patients with cochlear implants have the ability to exercise auditory control over their own speech production and over the speech of others, which is important for the development of speech control. In the present investigation three groups of 10 subjects were compared. The groups comprised: 1. cochlear implant users, 2. profoundly deaf using traditional hearing aids and 3. hearing controls. The subjects in three groups were matched in age. While repeating after a model the subjects were recorded and the following linguistic voice variables were analysed: 1. vowel formant space, 2. voice vs. voiceless difference, 3. closure duration and VOT, 4. word accent production, 5. sentence stress production, 6. voice quality, 7. pronunciation quality. Acoustic analysis and perceptual assessment by phoneticians showed that in great majority of variables, subjects with cochlear implants performed better than the profoundly deaf subjects with traditional hearing-aids. | ||
| 536 | |a Projekt MZOS |f 0130421 | ||
| 546 | |a ENG | ||
| 690 | |a 3.02 | ||
| 690 | |a 6.03 | ||
| 693 | |a acoustic analysis, speech perception, cochlear implants, hearing impairment. |l hrv |2 crosbi | ||
| 693 | |a acoustic analysis, speech perception, cochlear implants, hearing impairment. |l eng |2 crosbi | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Liker, Marko |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics |x 0269-9206 |g 20 (2006), 2/3 ; str. 211-217 | |
| 942 | |c CLA |t 1.01 |u 1 |z Znanstveni - clanak | ||
| 999 | |c 306002 |d 306000 | ||