Manipulation tactics and personality

Manipulation tactics represent different ways people try to influence others to do something for them. All people use them and they enable people to get what they need and want. Previous studies have shown that manipulation tactics covary significantly across data sources with different personality...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:317180/Details
Glavni autori: Butković, Ana (-), Bratko, Denis (Author)
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
Online pristup: Elektronička verzija sažetka
LEADER 02773naa a22002777i 4500
003 HR-ZaFF
005 20170606152556.0
008 131111s2011 xx 1 eng|d
999 |c 317180  |d 317178 
035 |a (CROSBI)524136 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |9 697  |a Butković, Ana 
245 1 0 |a Manipulation tactics and personality:   |b results of Croatian twin study /  |c Ana Butković, Denis Bratko. 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a Manipulation tactics and personality: results of Croatian twin study 
300 |f str. 
500 |a Knjiga sažetaka nije tiskana, već je dostupna isključivo na službenoj internetskoj stranici: http://www.issid2011.com/program/posters.pdf 
520 3 |a Manipulation tactics represent different ways people try to influence others to do something for them. All people use them and they enable people to get what they need and want. Previous studies have shown that manipulation tactics covary significantly across data sources with different personality measures. In this study, using behavioral‐genetic design, we tested the hypothesis that covariation between manipulation tactics and personality is due to overlapping genetic factors. Data was collected via mail from 338 twin pairs (36 MZM, 49 DZM, 69 MZF, 70 DZF, 114 DZO), aged between 15 and 22 (M=18.6, SD=2.31). All participants filled in NEO‐FFI and manipulation tactics questionnaire from which scores for three types of manipulation tactics were obtained (indirect tactics for coercion or ITC, direct tactics or DT and indirect tactics for humoring or ITH), as well as a total sum score (TM). Significant phenotypic correlations between manipulation tactics and personality were, as expected, in .14‐.26 range. Univariate analysis showed that both manipulation tactics and personality are heritable. In bivariate analyses significant genetic correlations were obtained between manipulation tactics and neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness. Results indicate that 76‐100% of phenotypic correlations between manipulation tactics and personality are due to overlapping genetic factors. 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130-1301683-1399 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 5.06 
693 |a manipulation tactics, personality, twin study, heritability  |l hrv  |2 crosbi 
693 |a manipulation tactics, personality, twin study, heritability  |l eng  |2 crosbi 
700 1 |9 398  |a Bratko, Denis  |4 aut 
773 0 |a International Society for the Study of Individual Differences 2011 (ISSID 2011) (25.-28.7.2011. ; London, Velika Britanija) 
856 |u http://138.73.201.21/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ISSID_2011_final_full_papers_with_rooms.pdf  |y Elektronička verzija sažetka 
942 |c RZB  |u 2  |v Recenzija  |z Znanstveni - Poster - Sazetak  |t 1.12