Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes

Research shows that division of attention during retrieval affects memory performance only minimally. This relative immunity of episodic retrieval is offset by a cost, as measured by the concurrent secondary task in a divided attention paradigm. This experiment was conducted with the aim of further...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:317600/Details
Matična publikacija: Proceedings of the 17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology
San Sebastian : European Society for Cognitive Psychology, 2011
Glavni autori: Vranić, Andrea (-), Tonković, Mirjana psihologinja (Author)
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
Online pristup: Elektronička verzija sažetka
LEADER 02783naa a2200265uu 4500
005 20150512091551.0
008 131111s2011 xx 1 eng|d
035 |a (CROSBI)553101 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |9 1013  |a Vranić, Andrea 
245 1 0 |a Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes /  |c Vranić, Andrea ; Tonković, Mirjana. 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes 
300 |a 177-177  |f str. 
520 |a Research shows that division of attention during retrieval affects memory performance only minimally. This relative immunity of episodic retrieval is offset by a cost, as measured by the concurrent secondary task in a divided attention paradigm. This experiment was conducted with the aim of further exploring this relative immunity and the attentional costs associated with what seems to be obligatory retrieval processes. More specifically, we aimed at exploring the attentional cost associated with each of three retrieval component-processes: 1) cue-encoding, 2) cue elaboration, 3) retrieval mode (Tulving, 1983). A componential analysis, as introduced by Naveh-Benjamin et al. (2000), was employed to assess attentional demands of four different retrieval tasks: two tapping the episodic and two tapping the semantic memory system. Furthermore, within each of these „system tasks“, one task was data-driven and one was conceptually-driven, as proposed by the transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) approach. Our results show a similar pattern of attentional costs of the three retrieval component-processes, across various types of retrieval. The cue elaboration was found to be the most attention demanding of the three component-processes, and also this process was shown to demand significantly more attention in the non-TAP situation. These findings are interpreted within the TAP framework. 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130-0000000-3295 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130-1301683-1417 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 5.06 
693 |a retrieval, attentional cost, transfer appropriate processing  |l hrv  |2 crosbi 
693 |a retrieval, attentional cost, transfer appropriate processing  |l eng  |2 crosbi 
700 1 |9 788  |a Tonković, Mirjana  |c psihologinja  |4 aut 
773 0 |a 17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (29.9.-2.10.2011. ; San Sebastian)  |t Proceedings of the 17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology  |d San Sebastian : European Society for Cognitive Psychology, 2011  |g str. 177-177 
856 |u http://escop.eu/site_media/uploads/books_of_abstracts/sansebastian_book_of_abstracts.pdf  |y Elektronička verzija sažetka 
942 |c RZB  |u 2  |v Recenzija  |z Znanstveni - Poster - Sazetak  |t 1.12 
999 |c 317600  |d 317598