Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate
Traditionally, logic textbooks treated ad hominem argument as fallacious and dismissed it as logically unacceptable. This general assumption changed with the work of Johnstone (1952) who showed that there are examples in which ad hominem is legitimate and non-fallacious argument. From the middle of...
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:318451/Similar |
|---|---|
| Glavni autor: | Kišiček, Gabrijela (-) |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
APA stil citiranja
Kišiček, G. (2017). Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate: Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate.
Chicago stil citiranjaKišiček, Gabrijela. Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate: Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate. 2017.
MLA stil citiranjaKišiček, Gabrijela. Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate: Argumentum ad hominem – good argument or fallacy? An analysis of Croatian parliamentary debate. 2017.