Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms
This paper questions the so-called idiom decomposition hypothesis (Gibbs & Nayak, 1989 ; Gibbs, et al. 1989), which presupposes that speakers have shared intuitions about the semantic compositionality of idioms, which in turn determines their syntactic flexibility. We have therefore conducted a...
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:322177/Similar |
|---|---|
| Glavni autori: | Zovko Dinković, Irena (-), Broz, Vlatko (Author) |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
APA stil citiranja
Zovko Dinković, I. (2013). Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms: Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms.
Chicago stil citiranjaZovko Dinković, Irena. Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms: Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms. 2013.
MLA stil citiranjaZovko Dinković, Irena. Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms: Transparency vs. analysability: Re-examining the theories and degrees of semantic compositionality of idioms. 2013.