Tko pobjeđuje u utrci s vremenom?

When we speak or think about time, we most often do it from one of two possible perspectives: ego-moving or time-moving. From ego-moving perspective, time is perceived as static while we perceive ourselves as moving through time. From time-moving perspective, time is perceived as something that move...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/nsk.NSK01001024854/Details
Matična publikacija: Psihologijske teme (Online)
27 (2018), 3 ; str. 385-408
Glavni autori: Mikša, Tena (Author), Tonković, Mirjana, psihologinja
Vrsta građe: e-članak
Jezik: hrv
Predmet:
Online pristup: https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.27.3.3
Elektronička verzija članka
Elektronička verzija članka
LEADER 03348naa a22003734i 4500
001 NSK01001024854
003 HR-ZaNSK
005 20190405140215.0
006 m d
007 cr||||||||||||
008 190321s2018 ci | |0|| ||hrv
024 7 |2 doi  |a 10.31820/pt.27.3.3 
035 |a (HR-ZaNSK)001024854 
040 |a HR-ZaNSK  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaNSK  |e ppiak 
041 0 |a hrv  |b eng  |b spa 
042 |a croatica 
044 |a ci  |c hr 
080 1 |a 159.9  |2 2011 
080 1 |a 11/12  |2 2011 
100 1 |a Mikša, Tena  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Tko pobjeđuje u utrci s vremenom?  |h [Elektronička građa] :  |b Individualne razlike u mentalnoj reprezentaciji vremena /  |c Tena Mikša, Mirjana Tonković. 
300 |b Ilustr. 
504 |a Bibliografija: str. 403-404. 
504 |a Abstract ; Resumen 
520 |a When we speak or think about time, we most often do it from one of two possible perspectives: ego-moving or time-moving. From ego-moving perspective, time is perceived as static while we perceive ourselves as moving through time. From time-moving perspective, time is perceived as something that moves towards us while we are static. Time perspective that a person uses can be determined by asking an ambiguous time question. It has been shown that people answer an ambiguous question from ego- and time- moving perspectives equally often. Furthermore, it has been shown that it is possible to prime participants to either ego- or time- moving perspective by giving them simple spatial tasks. Besides, it has been shown that there are some trait differences between participants who adopt ego-moving and those who adopt time-moving perspective. The aim of this research was to examine the frequency of adopting ego-moving and time-moving time representations in Croatia and to examine the possibility of priming time perspectives through spatial tasks. The aim of this study was also to examine individual differences between participants who spontaneously adopt ego-moving and those who adopt time-moving perspective on measures of locus of control, mastery and on the Time Metaphors Questionnaire. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental and one control group. Participants in experimental groups were first primed to time perspective and then answered an ambiguous question, while participants in the control group answered ambiguous questions without priming. All participants answered Time Metaphors Questionnaire, Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale and Pearlin Mastery Scale. Results showed that 35% of participants adopt ego-moving, while 65% adopt time-moving perspective. Priming did not influence on adopting time perspectives. As expected, participants who adopted ego-moving perspective showed more internal locus of control and scored higher 
653 0 |a Vremenske perspektive  |a Perspektiva kretanja vremena  |a Perspektiva kretanja ega 
700 1 |a Tonković, Mirjana,  |c psihologinja  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Psihologijske teme (Online)  |x 1849-0395  |g 27 (2018), 3 ; str. 385-408  |w nsk.(HR-ZaNSK)000848758 
981 |b Be2018  |b B01/18 
998 |b dalo1904 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.27.3.3 
856 4 0 |u https://hrcak.srce.hr/212666  |y Elektronička verzija članka 
856 4 1 |y Digitalna.nsk.hr 
856 4 0 |u http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/413  |y Elektronička verzija članka