The (in)visibility of value
Akeel Bilgrami (2016) has argued against the scientistic method and its treatment of ethical values by declaring it a superstition of science for not considering values to be part of nature. This paper agrees with the concept of the engaged self discussed by Bilgrami in order to make sense of ethica...
| Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/nsk.NSK01001084455/Details |
|---|---|
| Matična publikacija: |
Obnovljeni život (Online) 75 (2020), 4 ; str. 493-505 |
| Glavni autor: | Kumar Tarai, Ashoka (Author) |
| Vrsta građe: | e-članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
| Predmet: | |
| Online pristup: |
https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.75.4.4 Hrčak |
| LEADER | 02575naa a22003494i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NSK01001084455 | ||
| 003 | HR-ZaNSK | ||
| 005 | 20210126102203.0 | ||
| 006 | m d | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 201214s2020 ci |o |0|| ||eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | |2 doi |a 10.31337/oz.75.4.4 | |
| 035 | |a (HR-ZaNSK)001084455 | ||
| 040 | |a HR-ZaNSK |b hrv |c HR-ZaNSK |e ppiak | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng |b eng |b hrv | |
| 042 | |a croatica | ||
| 044 | |a ci |c hr | ||
| 080 | 1 | |a 14 |2 2011 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kumar Tarai, Ashoka |4 aut |9 HR-ZaNSK | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The (in)visibility of value |h [Elektronička građa] : |b a Wittgensteinian perspective / |c Ashoka Kumar Tarai. |
| 504 | |a Bibliografske bilješke uz tekst ; bibliografija: 13 jed. | ||
| 504 | |a Summary ; Sažetak. | ||
| 520 | |a Akeel Bilgrami (2016) has argued against the scientistic method and its treatment of ethical values by declaring it a superstition of science for not considering values to be part of nature. This paper agrees with the concept of the engaged self discussed by Bilgrami in order to make sense of ethical values. However, it attempts to argue against the conceptual incoherence by juxtaposing value properties and the engaged self. The incoherence can be avoided by following a Wittgensteinian understanding of ethical values which has been explicated very briefly, yet in a significant way, in Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus and also in A Lecture on Ethics in some detail. | ||
| 520 | |a Akeel Bilgrami (2016) zauzeo je stav protiv sijentističke metode i njezina postupanja prema etičkim vrijednostima tako da ju je proglasio praznovjerjem znanosti s obzirom na to da ne smatra da su vrijednosti dio prirode. Autor ovoga rada suglasan je s konceptom zauzetoga ja, o čemu Bilgrami raspravlja kako bi učinio smislenima etičke vrijednosti. Međutim rad nastoji argumentirati protiv koncepcijske nekoherentnosti tako da suprotstavlja svojstva vrijednosti i zauzeto ja. Nekoherentnost se može izbjeći slijedeći wittgensteinsko shvaćanje etičkih vrijednosti, što je obrazloženo vrlo sažeto, ali na istaknut način, u djelu Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus, a također u Predavanju o etici nešto detaljnije. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a Dihotomija |a Apsolutna vrijednost |a Relativna vrijednost | |
| 653 | 1 | |a Wittgenstein, Ludwig |a Bilgrami, Akeel | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Obnovljeni život (Online) |x 1849-0182 |g 75 (2020), 4 ; str. 493-505 |w nsk.(HR-ZaNSK)000567779 | |
| 981 | |b Be2020 |b B02/20 | ||
| 998 | |b tino2101 | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.75.4.4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hrcak.srce.hr/243927 |y Hrčak |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |y Digitalna.nsk.hr |