Too much or too little?

Disorders of agency could be described as cases where people encounter difficulties in assessing their own degree of responsibility or involvement with respect to a relevant action or event. These disturbances in one’s sense of agency appear to be meaningfully connected with some mental disorders an...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/nsk.NSK01001094800/Details
Matična publikacija: European journal of analytic philosophy (Online)
16 (2020), 2 ; str. 79-99
Glavni autor: Petrolini, Valentina (Author)
Vrsta građe: e-članak
Jezik: eng
Predmet:
Online pristup: https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.16.2.4
Hrčak
European journal of analytic philosophy (Online)
LEADER 04733naa a22003974i 4500
001 NSK01001094800
003 HR-ZaNSK
005 20210324151737.0
006 m d
007 cr||||||||||||
008 210319s2020 ci d |o |0|| ||eng
024 7 |2 doi  |a 10.31820/ejap.16.2.4 
035 |a (HR-ZaNSK)001094800 
040 |a HR-ZaNSK  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaNSK  |e ppiak 
041 0 |a eng  |b eng  |b hrv 
042 |a croatica 
044 |a ci  |c hr 
080 1 |a 44  |2 2011 
080 1 |a 616  |2 2011 
100 1 |a Petrolini, Valentina  |4 aut  |9 HR-ZaNSK 
245 1 0 |a Too much or too little?  |h [Elektronička građa] :  |b Disorders of agency on a spectrum /  |c Valentina Petrolini. 
300 |b Graf. prikazi. 
500 |a Bilješke uz tekst. 
500 |a Tema broja: The bounds of rationality. 
504 |a Bibliografske bilješke uz tekst ; bibliografija: str. 95-99. 
504 |a Abstract ; Sažetak. 
520 |a Disorders of agency could be described as cases where people encounter difficulties in assessing their own degree of responsibility or involvement with respect to a relevant action or event. These disturbances in one’s sense of agency appear to be meaningfully connected with some mental disorders and with some symptoms in particular—i.e. auditory verbal hallucinations, thought insertion, pathological guilt. A deeper understanding of these experiences may thus contribute to better identification and possibly treatment of people affected by such disorders. In this paper I explore disorders of agency to flesh out their phenomenology in more detail as well as to introduce some theoretical distinctions between them. Specifically, I argue that we may better understand disorders of agency by characterizing them as dimensional. In §1 I explore the cases of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (AVH) and pathological guilt and I show that they lie at opposite ends of the agency spectrum (i.e. hypoagency versus hyperagency). In §2 I focus on two intermediate cases of hypo- and hyper- agency. These are situations that, despite being very similar to pathological ones, may be successfully distinguished from them in virtue of quantitative factors (e.g. duration, frequency, intensity). I first explore the phenomenon of mind wandering as an example of hypoagency, and I then discuss the phenomenon of false confessions as an example of hyperagency. While cases of hypoagency exemplify situations where people experience their own thoughts, bodies, or actions as something beyond their control, experiences of hyperagency provide an illusory sense of control over actions or events. 
520 |a Poremećaji djelovanja mogu se opisati kao slučajevi u kojima ljudi nailaze na teškoće u procjeni svojeg stupnja odgovornosti ili sudjelovanja u nekom djelovanju ili događaju. Ove se smetnje u nečijem osjećaju djelovanja čine na značajan način povezane s mentalnim poremećajima, a posebno s nekim simptomima – auditornim halucinacijama verbalnog tipa, umetanjem misli i patološkom krivnjom. Bolje shvaćanje ovih iskustava moglo bi poboljšati prepoznavanje, a možda i tretman ljudi koji pate od takvih poremećaja. U ovom članku proučavam poremećaje djelovanja kako bih detaljnije pojasnila njihovu fenomenologiju te između njih uvela neka teorijska razlikovanja. Konkretnije, tvrdit ću da ćemo poremećaje djelovanja možda moći bolje razumjeti ako ih okarakteriziramo kao dimenzionalne. U prvom dijelu proučavam slučajeve auditornih halucinacija verbalnog tipa (AVH) i patološke krivnje te pokazujem da leže na suprotnim krajevima spektra djelovanja (hipoagencija naspram hiperagencije). U drugom dijelu bavim se dvama međuslučajevima hipo i hiperagencije. Iako su vrlo slične patološkima, ove se situacije mogu uspješno razlučiti od njih na temelju kvantitativnih faktora (poput trajanja, frekvencije i intenziteta). Prvo istražujem fenomen lutanja misli kao primjer hipoagencije, a zatim razmatram fenomen lažnih ispovijesti kao primjer hiperagencije. Dok se slučajevi hipoagencije odnose na situacije u kojima ljudi osjećaju da su njihove misli, tijela i djelovanja izvan njihove kontrole, iskustva hiperagencije pružaju varljiv osjećaj kontrole nad djelovanjem i događajima. 
653 0 |a Djelovanje  |a Halucinacije  |a Krivnja 
773 0 |t European journal of analytic philosophy (Online)  |x 1849-0514  |g 16 (2020), 2 ; str. 79-99  |w nsk.(HR-ZaNSK)000849430 
981 |b Be2020  |b B02/20 
998 |b tino2103 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.16.2.4 
856 4 0 |u https://hrcak.srce.hr/246178  |y Hrčak 
856 4 1 |y Digitalna.nsk.hr 
856 4 0 |u https://eujap.uniri.hr/too-much-or-too-little-disorders-of-agency-on-a-spectrum/  |y European journal of analytic philosophy (Online)