Acts that kill and acts that do not
In response to recent debates on the need to abandon the Dead Donor Rule (DDR) to facilitate vital-organ transplantation, I claim that, through a detailed philosophical analysis of the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) and the DDR, some acts that seem to violate DDR in fact do not, thus DDR...
Permalink: | http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/nsk.NSK01001137776/Details |
---|---|
Matična publikacija: |
European journal of analytic philosophy (Online) 17 (2021), 1 ; str. (A3)5-31 |
Glavni autor: | Tsai, Cheng-Chih (Author) |
Vrsta građe: | e-članak |
Jezik: | eng |
Predmet: | |
Online pristup: |
https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.17.1.4 Hrčak European journal of analytic philosophy (Online) |
LEADER | 03486naa a22003734i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NSK01001137776 | ||
003 | HR-ZaNSK | ||
005 | 20220714150849.0 | ||
006 | m d | ||
007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
008 | 220511s2021 ci d |o |0|| ||eng | ||
024 | 7 | |2 doi |a 10.31820/ejap.17.1.4 | |
035 | |a (HR-ZaNSK)001137776 | ||
040 | |a HR-ZaNSK |b hrv |c HR-ZaNSK |e ppiak | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a croatica | ||
044 | |a ci |c hr | ||
080 | 1 | |a 17 |2 2011 | |
080 | 1 | |a 616 |2 2011 | |
100 | 1 | |a Tsai, Cheng-Chih |4 aut |9 HR-ZaNSK | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Acts that kill and acts that do not |h [Elektronička građa] : |b a philosophical analysis of the Dead Donor Rule / |c Cheng-Chih Tsai. |
300 | |b Graf. prikazi. | ||
504 | |a Bibliografske bilješke uz tekst ; bibliografija: str. 29-31. | ||
504 | |a Abstract ; Sažetak. | ||
520 | |a In response to recent debates on the need to abandon the Dead Donor Rule (DDR) to facilitate vital-organ transplantation, I claim that, through a detailed philosophical analysis of the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) and the DDR, some acts that seem to violate DDR in fact do not, thus DDR can be upheld. The paper consists of two parts. First, standard apparatuses of the philosophy of language, such as sense, referent, truth condition, and definite description are employed to show that there exists an internally consistent and coherent interpretation of UDDA which resolves the Reduction Problem and the Ambiguity Problem that allegedly threaten the UDDA framework, and as a corollary, the practice of Donation after the Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD) does not violate DDR. Second, an interpretation of the DDR, termed "No Hastening Death Rule" (NHDR), is formulated so that, given that autonomy and non-maleficence principles are observed, the waiting time for organ procurement can be further shortened without DDR being violated. | ||
520 | |a Kao odgovor na nedavne rasprave o potrebi napuštanja pravila mrtvog donora (DDR) radi olakšavanja transplantacije vitalnih organa, oslanjajući se na detaljnu filozofsku analizu Jedinstvenog zakona o utvrđivanju smrti (UDDA) i DDR-a, tvrdim da za neka djela za koja se čini da krše DDR, zapravo ga ne krše, stoga se DDR može podržati. Rad se sastoji od dva dijela. Prvo, koriste se standardni alati filozofije jezika, poput smisla, referencije, istinosnih uvjeta i određenog opisa kako bi se pokazalo da postoji interno konzistentna i koherentna interpretacija UDDA koja rješava problem redukcije i problem dvosmislenosti koji navodno prijete UDDA okviru, te kao posljedica toga, praksa darivanja nakon cirkulacijskog utvrđivanja smrti (DCDD) ne krši DDR. Drugo, tumačenje DDR-a, nazvano ‘Pravilo brze smrti’ (NHDR), formulirano je tako da se, s obzirom na poštivanje načela autonomije i ne-zlonamjernosti, vrijeme čekanja na nabavu organa može dodatno skratiti bez kršenja DDR-a. | ||
653 | 0 | |a Doniranje organa |a Pravilo mrtvog darovatelja |a Utvrđivanje smrti |a Filozofska analiza | |
773 | 0 | |t European journal of analytic philosophy (Online) |x 1849-0514 |g 17 (2021), 1 ; str. (A3)5-31 |w nsk.(HR-ZaNSK)000849430 | |
981 | |b Be2021 |b B02/21 | ||
998 | |b tino2207 | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.17.1.4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hrcak.srce.hr/257696 |y Hrčak |
856 | 4 | 1 | |y Digitalna.nsk.hr |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://eujap.uniri.hr/acts-that-kill-and-acts-that-do-not-a-philosophical-analysis-of-the-dead-donor-rule/ |y European journal of analytic philosophy (Online) |