Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals - a covert form of research misconduct?

A predatory journal could be provisionally defined as one masquerading as a genuine academic publication but offer little, if any, rigorous peer review. Predatory journals or publishers place a focus on maximising financial profit, as opposed to regulated dissemination of scientific advancements. As...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupni.nsk.hr/Record/nsk.NSK01001163314/Details
Matična publikacija: Biochemia medica (Online)
31 (2021), 3 ; str. 395-402
Glavni autori: Yeo-Teh, Nicole Shu Ling (Author), Tang, Bor Luen
Vrsta građe: e-članak
Jezik: eng
Online pristup: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030201
Elektronička verzija članka
Elektronička verzija članka
Elektronička verzija članka
LEADER 03001naa a22003494i 4500
001 NSK01001163314
003 HR-ZaNSK
005 20230213141600.0
006 m d
007 cr||||||||||||
008 230213s2021 ci |o |0|| ||eng
024 7 |2 doi  |a 10.11613/BM.2021.030201 
035 |a (HR-ZaNSK)001163314 
040 |a HR-ZaNSK  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaNSK  |e ppiak 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a croatica 
044 |a ci  |c hr 
080 1 |2 2011 
100 1 |a Yeo-Teh, Nicole Shu Ling  |4 aut  |9 HR-ZaNSK 
245 1 0 |a Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals - a covert form of research misconduct?  |h [Elektronička građa]  |c Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang. 
300 |b Ilustr. 
504 |a Bibliografija: 
504 |a Summary. 
520 |a A predatory journal could be provisionally defined as one masquerading as a genuine academic publication but offer little, if any, rigorous peer review. Predatory journals or publishers place a focus on maximising financial profit, as opposed to regulated dissemination of scientific advancements. As a result, authors can often get their work published in such journals with little scrutiny on quality. Although generally warned against and discouraged, universally practiced sanctions against researchers" submission to and publication in predatory journals are not common. Predatory publishing thus remains prevalent, particularly in places where academic success is measured by the quantity rather than quality of publication output, which feeds the journal"s business model that thrives upon significant market demand. However, such an undesirable enterprise has the potential to flood the scientific literature with unsound research that could be misleadingly perceived as authoritative. This may result in or add to the confusion of policy makers and the layperson, consequentially bringing disrepute to science and all parties involved. Here, we argue that wilfully submitting one"s manuscript to a predatory journal may constitute an active act of avoidance of rigorous peer review of one"s work. If such is the intention, it would be a questionable research practice and could be considered an, albeit covert, form of scientific misconduct. If labelled as such, and with institutional and funding rules erected to discourage the practice, predatory publishing could be effectively put out of business through diminishing the consumer demand. 
700 1 |a Tang, Bor Luen  |4 aut  |9 HR-ZaNSK 
773 0 |t Biochemia medica (Online)  |x 1846-7482  |g 31 (2021), 3 ; str. 395-402  |w nsk.(HR-ZaNSK)000655372 
981 |b Be2021 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030201 
856 4 0 |u https://www.biochemia-medica.com/en/journal/31/3/10.11613/BM.2021.030201  |y Elektronička verzija članka 
856 4 0 |u https://www.biochemia-medica.com/en/journal/31/3/10.11613/BM.2021.030201/fullArticle  |y Elektronička verzija članka 
856 4 1 |y Digitalna.nsk.hr 
856 4 0 |u https://hrcak.srce.hr/264022  |y Elektronička verzija članka